Presumably, Airbus didn't sneak this into the testing? :)
"The matrix also features tests in which the KC-45A will be a receiver, taking fuel from a KC-10."
Pretty ballsy for an Airbus advocate to characterize 747 profits as a "subsidy."
The article's title justifies the content. These are relevant questions and I do not see any anti-Airbus theme here. There is much more of that in the comments. Get over the competition and focus...
Always wondered why the crash site was never targeted with a cruise missile to, at the very least, make what remained of the aircraft as useless to salvagers as we could make it.
Alexandreba, did you even read the article? Boeing, not the taxpayers, are carrying the overrun.