NavWeek -- Sub Sense


It’s becoming increasingly clear the U.S. Navy is serious about saving as much money as it can in designing and building its Ohio-class ballistic submarine (SSBN) replacement fleet. As service officials realize, successfully navigating this program will depend a lot on dollars and cents – as well as common sense.

The Navy has even developed some unique contracting procedures to help keep the program financially stable.

Rear Adm. David Johnson, the Navy program executive officer for submarines, has underscored the importance of controlling costs, even at the earliest stages of program development, and remarks he made earlier this year are included in the recent Naval Submarine League Submarine Review.

His comments are worth repeating.

“As we move through the Technology Development Phase we are looking at ways to control costs,” he says. “While this part of the program accounts for only about 6% of the Oho Replacement’s total program costs, it can have lasting effects on the ship’s total cost. Investing now will allow us to save over the life of the program. So, for this 6% investment, we will design an SSBN with SSN (attack sub)-like stealth at SSBN speeds, produceability and affordability, [restart] the missile tube industrial base, [establish] three major test facilities, and [build] a class that provides 124 strategic deterrence patrols [on] an SSBN operational cycle with SSN technology.”

He goes on to say, “The research and development contract we signed last December is truly a unique agreement in that we are incentivizing General Dynamics Electric Boat, which is the prime on the contract, to lower costs across all three phases of the Ohio Replacement—design, construction, and operations and sustainment. Whereas the Virginia-class (SSN) conducted successful acquisition and life cycle cost reductions during production, the Ohio Replacement is baking this into the program from the very beginning. This will maximize our savings while also ensuring that the boat we design and deliver has the requisite capabilities to successfully operate into the 2080s.”

The contract, and really the program as a whole, he says, is “embracing” the Pentagon’s Better Buying Power initiatives by targeting affordability and reducing cost growth.

“This is a unique research and development contract in that it purchases both level of effort and specific deliverables in a cost-plus fixed-fee incentivized contract,” he contends. “This is the first time that I can remember a research and design contract being incentivized to reduce total program costs starting with the non-recurring engineering work, to construction, and operating and support. By starting to look at how to make the Ohio replacement as affordable as possible now, we have the ability to really reduce the program’s entire life-cycle cost.”

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Ares?

Aviation Week's defense blog

From The Archives

Aviation Week is approaching its 100th anniversary in 2016. In a series of blogs, our editors highlight editorial content from the magazine's long and rich history.


Sep 18, 2015

The U.S.-Russian Moon Landing That Never Happened (1963) 7

U.S. President John F. Kennedy is well known for the 1961 speech to Congress in which he made the Apollo program a national goal. Less remembered is his controversial offer two years later to cooperate with the Soviet Union on a manned lunar landing....More
Sep 10, 2015

Airbus A380 Is Your Hotel In The Sky (2001) 5

In a September 2001 advertisement, Airbus promised to bring glamour back to passenger travel with its new A380, comparing the double-decker airliner to a hotel....More
Sep 9, 2015

Pratt & Whitney's Record Behind the DC-6 Record (1947) 2

Pratt & Whitney takes to the cover of AVIATION to credit its Double Wasp engines for the DC-6's record transatlantic flight....More
Aug 27, 2015

Aviation Week Lifts Veil On Boeing B-52 Bomber (1952) 22

In 1952, Aviation Week provided the first details on the new Boeing B-52 bomber....More
Blog Archive
Penton Corporate

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×