'Libya' New Byword for Franco-British Cooperation


At the annual Summer Defense University meeting of senior military officers and officials, industry leaders and parliamentarians, hosted this year by the French navy at the Naval School in Brest, there was much talk of Franco-British cooperation and the word “Libya” popped up in almost every round-table meeting and conversation.

But not everyone had the same interpretation of the lessons learned even if all were agreed that the air exclusion operation over Libya had created a sea change in the way the French and British armed forces work together.

Sir Peter Ricketts, the British ambassador in Paris (and, it must be pointed out, former British ambassador to NATO), speaking in flawless French, pointed out that without the help of NATO's experience in command and control and the “help and support” of the United States, France and the UK could not have carried out this operation. One possible conclusion, he suggested, was that the European Union should procure all the capacities necessary to undertake such an operation autonomously.

But he immediately provided the counter argument, saying that this would “need billions of euros” and pointed out that in the current economic situation the monies could not be found.

Admitting that nobody in the room would be surprised, Ricketts reiterated the well-known and traditional UK posture that “we strongly doubt that it is really necessary to add to [European Union] capacities”, adding that Libya had proved that it was possible for the NATO structures to be used for an operation led by Europeans.

What did lead to debates over lunch was his statement that current Franco-British cooperation was based on the St Malo agreement of 1998 which he described as being fundamental for both countries to project armed forces abroad.

But defense analysts argued that St Malo had been a total failure and therefore the November 2010 Lancaster House treaty was everything St Malo was not. “It's simple,” I heard, “if it was in the St Malo Treaty then the opposite will be done in the Lancaster House framework.”

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Ares?

Aviation Week editors blog their personal views on the defense industry.

A Century of Aviation Week

Aviation Week & Space Technology is celebrating its 100th anniversary this year. In a series of blogs, our editors highlight editorial content from the magazine's long and rich history.


Aug 26, 2016

When Aviation Week Was Accused of Treason -- The Back Story Revealed 8

A 1957 revelation that the U.S. was tracking Soviet missile launches from a secret radar in Turkey has its roots in sleuthing of students from Kettering Grammar School in the UK....More
Aug 23, 2016

When Aviation Week Was Accused Of Treason 23

Aviation Week editors routinely get blowback when they write about sensitive topics, and the best example of that may be an October 1957 story that revealed the U.S. had been tracking Russian missile launches from advanced long-range radar units in Turkey....More
Blog Archive
Penton Corporate

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×