To be effective, President Clinton's declared war on terrorism will require a sustained campaign using aerial bombing and ground forces, not just missile attacks like those against Sudan and Afghanistan, strategists say. Some suggested that B-52 strikes should have accompanied the cruise missile attack on Afghanistan to ensure lethality, and that a commando drop there might have produced an intelligence windfall in the aftermath. They agreed, however, that cruise missiles were ...
THIS CONTENT REQUIRES SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS
You must be a paid subscriber to access "Strategists Question U.S. Steadfastness".
Current Aviation Week Intelligence Network (AWIN) enterprise and individual members: please go to http://awin.aviationweek.com for access.
Not currently a subscriber? Click on the "Learn More" button below to view subscription offers.